Covering the environment as a mystery story
Sunday, October 4th, 2009By David Poulson
The scarlet dye trailed across the ice like blood on a bedsheet.
Scientists from the Woods Hole Oceangraphic Institution had lugged nine pounds of the concentrated pigment to a fissure in the Greenland ice sheet. The plan was to use the dye to trace the water melting from the ice as it disappeared to the land a half-mile below, lubricating the bedrock and speeding the ice’s march to the ocean. It’s an important mechanism to understand as scientists look at how the melting of the ice pack accelerates with global warming even faster than once predicted.
Students at Michigan State University’s Knight Center for Environmental Journalism got an up close look at the research last week from Woods Hole science writer Amy Nevala.
Amy, a Knight Center graduate, accompanied the researchers in 2008 to tell their story with regular reports from the field and articles in the institution’s Oceanus magazine. Later she edited a multimedia account of the trip, including the dye experiment. It’s a pretty good taste of some fascinating research, except…
Well, the scientists never did find where that dye came out.
A researcher 25 miles away each day for a week tested the water where satellite imagery seemed to indicate the dye should appear. No luck.
I have to admit that my initial reaction to this part of the piece was disappointment. I wanted to see that dye come out from beneath the ice sheet. But then I began to wonder: Where did it go? Did it get hung up in some vast lake suspended in mid-ice? Was the volume of water large enough to dilute any trace of the dye? Did the dye follow an entirely unanticipated route? Was it just slower than expected and later emerged after the researchers left?
My reaction perhaps was not unlike the researchers themselves. After all, just because an experiment does not work as expected doesn’t mean it is a failure. As my frustration turned to wonder, I felt a compulsion to turn the page, to read the next chapter of this story.
It is the kind of impulse that environmental journalists can use to their advantage. Unlike other journalists, our stories rarely conclude. Crooks get arrested, streets get paved, elections produce winners, city councils approve budgets, lawmakers pass laws. But the environmental story often is open-ended, leading to yet more speculation and uncertainty.
So use it.
Think of the environmental story as one of the world’s great mysteries. Tell it like the mystery story that it is. Put in the false starts, add the suspense, milk the frustration and dazzle with wonder. Unravel it as far as the facts allow. Take your reader to the brink of understanding. Then leave them with a cliffhanger.
If nothing else, you’re creating an audience for those hungering for the next installment.
The Woods Hole researchers planned to take what they learned and redesign their experiment. I sure hope Amy lets us know what happens next.